The Economy of Mercy
Luke 15:1-10
Gospel Reading for the Seventeenth Sunday after Pentecost (Year C)
In my mind, Luke 15 has always started with verse 11. The beautiful final chapter of Jesus' "Lost" trilogy challenges even as it paints a vivid picture of God's grace. A lost sheep and a lost coin? Neither can hold a candle to a parent abandoning all dignity as they sprint to welcome a wayward child. I've never given the sheep and coin their due.
The first two stories are about material possessions. I admit that, if we're going with the popular interpretation that the lost change and wandering wooly is a stand-in for us prodigals, the idea of people as possessions is a bit of a sticky wicket. Laying that aside for the time being, these are stories of treasured items. This is about economics. Sheep were valuable property. The lost coin was worth about a day's wages.
Through this lens, the story of the lost coin makes a little bit more sense. The woman would have been ecstatic to find a missing day's wages. Maybe not throw-a-huge-party excited, but excited nonetheless. The shepherd leaving ninety-nine sheep behind for a missing fluffy animal veers into the realm of fuzzy math. Risking 99% of one's assets may be taken or wander off for a single sheep is typically bad business.
So in spite of this fairly sensible, albeit exuberant, middle part of the trilogy, God's economic sense seems to be somewhat askew. Mercy and grace seems to work in a way the world that the world would find bewildering. By the time we get to the third story--with its father giving away a fortune to only be squandered and throwing a lavish party for a financial blackhole of a son--we learn that grace works on some strange yet beautiful logic.
We learn that God rejoices over that which is found regardless of whether the world views it as fairly valuable (the coin), minimally valuable (one sheep out of one hundred), or of hardly any value at all (the son). No matter what is lost, the result is the same: pure unbridled joy. That does not make sense to us. Yet I am grateful that God's economy of mercy works in such mysterious ways.

I believe that most of us experience an internal tug-of-war between the past and the future. In The Screwtape Letters, C.S. Lewis’ titular demon supervisor advises his underling Wormwood that one of best ways to keep a human from doing good is to keep them ping-ponging between those two times that are not the present. One keeps trying to recapture or reach towards moments that are mist. It can keep a person from doing something.
The quote above resonates with me because it harnesses the past and unfinished future into a catalyst that animates our present. We remember the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus because it means something today and compels us to presently work for the Good that is already here, but also not yet. We remember the hope and pain of the past to do something that help us take some sort of step each and every day. We realize that the hope which exists within the gospel story is not yet fully realized. Many people are still being left behind and forgotten. The realization, as the theologian Metz states, puts pressure and questions on the present.